BISP 2026-27: 844 Billion Rupees and a 16.9% Rise
What the Benazir Income Support Programme is, how it is targeted, and how much it grew
By the ISN Media desk • June 2026 • Approx. 8-min read
The Benazir Income Support Programme is Pakistan's largest social safety net, and one of the most visible lines in the budget. This explainer sets out its 2026-27 allocation, how it grew, how recipients are chosen, and what the programme actually pays. The figures are Budget Estimates from the Government of Pakistan, in billions of rupees. It sits under the pillar BISP, subsidies and the politics of cash support.
How much is BISP in the 2026-27 budget?
The Benazir Income Support Programme is allocated about Rs 844.8 billion in 2026-27, a rise of about 16.9 percent over the previous year, while total social protection comes to about Rs 857 billion. BISP sits within a wider grants-and-transfers head of about Rs 2,680 billion, which itself rose close to 39 percent. The increase came in a year when the development programme was cut about 9 percent, so cash support grew while investment shrank.
That is the headline. The detail follows.
The figures, and the direction
BISP rose from about Rs 722.5 billion to about Rs 844.8 billion, an increase of about 17 percent, one of the larger gains anywhere in the budget. Total social protection, of which BISP is the main part, rose by a similar proportion to about Rs 857 billion.
| Line | FY 2025-26 | FY 2026-27 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benazir Income Support Programme | 722.5 | 844.8 | +16.9% |
| Social protection (total) | 734.2 | 857.0 | +16.7% |
| Grants and transfers (incl. BISP) | 1,928 | 2,680 | +39.0% |
Figures in billions of rupees.
Two features stand out. Cash support grew faster than inflation in a year when development was cut, which indicates what the budget chose to protect. And the wider grants head grew by close to two fifths, of which BISP is one component, so cash support is part of a broader expansion of transfers.
What BISP is
BISP began in 2008 and has grown across successive governments into the country's flagship safety-net programme. It makes payments to low-income families identified through a national means test, and it has both unconditional and conditional components. Over time it has expanded in coverage and in the range of support it offers, and it is now one of the largest cash-transfer programmes in the region.
How BISP targets the poor
Recipients are identified through a national registry that scores households on a means test, rather than being selected locally, which is intended to reduce the discretion through which patronage usually operates. The registry is periodically updated through a national survey of household circumstances.
The targeting machinery is central to the programme's credibility, and international assessments, including by the World Bank, have praised it. Payments are made to the woman of the household, a design choice intended to strengthen the position of women within the family as well as to improve the reliability of delivery. The use of a biometric, means-tested registry and payment to women are the features most often cited in the programme's favour.
What BISP pays
The programme runs through several components. The core is an unconditional cash transfer, often referred to as Kafaalat, paid to eligible women. Alongside it are conditional payments: an education stipend, sometimes called Taleemi Wazaif, tied to children remaining in school, and a nutrition component, sometimes called Nashonuma, aimed at mothers and young children in their first years.
The conditional components are designed to turn a transfer into something more than relief, by linking part of the money to schooling and health. The balance between the large unconditional core and the smaller conditional and graduation components is central to the debate over whether cash support is a plan or a holding pattern, examined in cash support versus education.
Why it is backed by the lenders
Part of BISP's recent growth has external backing. The International Monetary Fund, in its programmes with Pakistan, has consistently supported expanding direct cash transfers, on the reasoning that they reach the poor more efficiently than broad, untargeted subsidies, and that they cushion vulnerable households against the austerity the programmes require. So the rise in BISP is, in part, a feature of the reform path Pakistan has agreed with its lenders, not only a domestic political choice.
The graduation question
The sharpest open question about BISP is whether it moves families out of poverty or sustains them within it. A transfer that arrives every month keeps a family from falling further, but it does not, on its own, lift them across the poverty line and off the programme. The programme's answer is graduation, pairing the transfer with assets, training or enterprise support so a household can build an income that eventually replaces the payment. Graduation initiatives exist but are small relative to the unconditional core, and the budget does not report how many families have actually left the programme better off. That missing figure is the most important piece of absent information in this part of the budget.
How BISP has grown over time
BISP has expanded substantially since it began in 2008, both in the number of families it covers and in the range of support it offers. What started as a relatively simple cash-transfer scheme has become a platform carrying several programmes, an unconditional core, an education stipend, a nutrition component and graduation pilots, reaching millions of households across the country. Each budget has tended to raise its allocation, and the 2026-27 figure of about Rs 844.8 billion continues that trajectory.
The steady growth is itself part of the debate. Supporters see an expanding, well-targeted safety net reaching more of the poor; critics see a permanent and growing commitment whose effect on poverty over time is not measured. Both readings start from the same fact, that the programme is large and rising, and diverge on what that growth means.
Where BISP sits in the budget
It helps to place BISP within the budget's structure. It is the main component of social protection, which is itself part of the wider grants-and-transfers head. That head, at about Rs 2,680 billion, also includes grants to provinces and state bodies and other transfers, so BISP, at about Rs 845 billion, is a large but not majority part of it. Read against the whole budget of Rs 18,771 billion, BISP is about 4.5 percent, a significant line but far smaller than interest or defence. Keeping these proportions in view guards against both overstating and understating the programme's place.
Frequently asked questions
How much is BISP in the 2026-27 budget? About Rs 844.8 billion, up about 16.9 percent on the year. Total social protection, of which BISP is the main part, is about Rs 857 billion, within a wider grants-and-transfers head of about Rs 2,680 billion.
How are BISP recipients chosen? Through a national registry that scores households on a means test, rather than local selection. The registry is updated through a national survey, and payments are made to the woman of the household.
What does BISP pay? An unconditional core transfer (Kafaalat) to eligible women, plus conditional components: an education stipend (Taleemi Wazaif) tied to school attendance, and a nutrition component (Nashonuma) for mothers and young children.
Why does the IMF support BISP? Because targeted cash transfers reach the poor more efficiently than broad, untargeted subsidies, and they cushion vulnerable households against austerity. The IMF has consistently backed expanding direct cash in its programmes with Pakistan.
Did BISP grow faster than other spending? Yes. Its 16.9 percent rise outpaced inflation and came in a year when the development programme was cut about 9 percent. The wider grants-and-transfers head rose close to 39 percent.
What is the graduation question? Whether BISP moves families out of poverty or sustains them within it. Graduation efforts pair cash with assets or training, but they are small relative to the unconditional core, and the budget does not report how many families have left the programme better off.
Is BISP considered well-run? Its targeting machinery, a biometric, means-tested registry with payment to women, has been praised by the World Bank and others. Debate centres less on its delivery than on its politics and on whether cash alone reduces poverty.
When did BISP begin? In 2008. It has since expanded across successive governments from a simple cash-transfer scheme into a platform carrying several programmes, reaching millions of households.
What share of the budget is BISP? About 4.5 percent of the total budget of Rs 18,771 billion. It is a significant line but far smaller than interest (about 43 percent) or defence (about 16 percent).
Why is BISP paid to women? Paying the woman of the household is intended to strengthen women's position within the family and to improve the reliability of delivery. It is one of the design features most often cited in the programme's favour.
Sources and notes
- Government of Pakistan, Federal Budget 2026-27: BISP and social-protection figures are Budget Estimates in billions of rupees, rounded for readability.
- The descriptions of BISP's components and targeting reflect the programme's official structure and World Bank assessments of it.
- IMF support for targeted cash transfers reflects published programme documents for Pakistan.
Admin